Title 016 | Chapter 007 | Regulation 011
INACTIVE
This document is no longer current.
EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CABINET
Education Professional Standards Board
(New Administrative Regulation)
16 KAR 7:011.Repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
Section 1.
16 KAR 7:010, Kentucky Teacher Internship Program, is hereby repealed.JUSTIN MITCHELL, Board Chair
APPROVED BY AGENCY: June 4, 2024
FILED WITH LRC: June 14, 2024 at 11:25 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT PERIOD: A public hearing on this proposed administrative regulation shall be held on August 27, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. in the State Board Room, Fifth Floor, 300 Sower Boulevard, Frankfort, Kentucky. Individuals interested in being heard at this meeting shall notify this agency in writing five working days prior to the hearing, of their intent to attend. If no notification of intent to attend the hearing is received by that date, the hearing may be canceled. This hearing is open to the public. Any person who wishes to be heard will be given an opportunity to comment on the proposed administrative regulation. A transcript of the public hearing will not be made unless a written request for a transcript is made. If you do not wish to be heard at the public hearing, you may submit written comments on the proposed administrative regulation. Written comments shall be accepted through August 31, 2024. Send written notification of intent to be heard at the public hearing or written comments on the proposed administrative regulation to:
CONTACT PERSON: Todd Allen, General Counsel, Kentucky Department of Education, 300 Sower Boulevard, 5th Floor, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, phone 502-564-4474, fax 502-564-9321; email regcomments@education.ky.gov.
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TIERING STATEMENT
Contact Person:
Todd Allen
(1) Provide a brief summary of:
(a) What this administrative regulation does:
This administrative regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010 which establishes the standards for the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program.
(b) The necessity of this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation is necessary to repeal 16 KAR 7:010 which establishes the standards for the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program.
(c) How this administrative regulation conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
KRS 13A.310 allows the EPSB to repeal regulations that it wishes to no longer be effective. This regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010 because Senate Bill 265 of the 2024 Legislative Session amended KRS 161.030 to delete the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program from statute.
(d) How this administrative regulation currently assists or will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
This administrative regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010 to conform with Senate Bill 265 from the 2024 Legislative Session.
(2) If this is an amendment to an existing administrative regulation, provide a brief summary of:
(a) How the amendment will change this existing administrative regulation:
(b) The necessity of the amendment to this administrative regulation:
(c) How the amendment conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
(d) How the amendment will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
(3) List the type and number of individuals, businesses, organizations, or state and local governments affected by this administrative regulation:
171 Kentucky school districts and those pursuing initial teacher certification.
(4) Provide an analysis of how the entities identified in question (3) will be impacted by either the implementation of this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change, if it is an amendment, including:
(a) List the actions that each of the regulated entities identified in question (3) will have to take to comply with this administrative regulation or amendment:
No action will be needed to comply with this repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
(b) In complying with this administrative regulation or amendment, how much will it cost each of the entities identified in question (3):
There is no cost for complying with this repealer.
(c) As a result of compliance, what benefits will accrue to the entities identified in question (3):
Compliance will result in alignment with KRS 161.030 as amended by Senate Bill 265 from the 2024 Legislative Session which removed the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program from statute.
(5) Provide an estimate of how much it will cost the administrative body to implement this administrative regulation:
(a) Initially:
There are no costs expected to implement this repealer.
(b) On a continuing basis:
There are no expected continuing costs with this repealer.
(6) What is the source of the funding to be used for the implementation and enforcement of this administrative regulation:
No funding is needed as it is simply a repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
(7) Provide an assessment of whether an increase in fees or funding will be necessary to implement this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change if it is an amendment:
An increase in fees or funding will not be necessary for the Education Professional Standards Board to repeal 16 KAR 7:010.
(8) State whether or not this administrative regulation establishes any fees or directly or indirectly increases any fees:
No fees are established or increased by this repealer.
(9) TIERING: Is tiering applied?
Tiering is not applicable as this is simply a repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(1) Identify each state statute, federal statute, or federal regulation that requires or authorizes the action taken by the administrative regulation.
KRS 13A.310
(2) Identify the promulgating agency and any other affected state units, parts, or divisions:
The Education Professional Standards Board.
(a) Estimate the following for the first year:
Expenditures:
No additional expenditures are expected to be needed since this repeals a program that has been unfunded since 2018.
Revenues:
The amendment to this administrative regulation is not expected to generate any revenue.
Cost Savings:
No cost savings are expected with this amendment as the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program was only operational if there was an appropriation. The program has been unfunded since 2018, and has not been in operation since that time.
(b) How will expenditures, revenues, or cost savings differ in subsequent years?
Expenditures, revenues and cost savings are not expected to differ in subsequent years.
(3) Identify affected local entities (for example: cities, counties, fire departments, school districts):
Public-school districts.
(a) Estimate the following for the first year:
Expenditures:
There are no expected expenditures for districts as this is a repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
Revenues:
This regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010. It will not generate revenue for districts.
Cost Savings:
There are no cost savings expected with this amendment.
(b) How will expenditures, revenues, or cost savings differ in subsequent years?
The expenditures, revenues and cost savings are not expected to differ in subsequent years.
(4) Identify additional regulated entities not listed in questions (2) or (3):
Applicants for initial teacher certification.
(a) Estimate the following for the first year:
Expenditures:
There are no expected expenditures for applicants to comply with this repealer.
Revenues:
This regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010. It will not generate revenue for applicants.
Cost Savings:
There is no expected cost savings since there are no fees created or reduced by this regulation.
(b) How will expenditures, revenues, or cost savings differ in subsequent years?
The expenditures, revenues and cost savings are not expected to differ in subsequent years.
(5) Provide a narrative to explain the:
(a) Fiscal impact of this administrative regulation:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of the proposed repealer. This is simply repealing the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program which previously had an appropriation for operation and has been unfunded and not operational since the Spring of 2018.
(b) Methodology and resources used to determine the fiscal impact:
The methodology and resources used to determine that there is no fiscal impact, is this is simply repealing the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program which previously had an appropriation for operation and has been unfunded and not operational since the Spring of 2018.
(6) Explain:
(a) Whether this administrative regulation will have an overall negative or adverse major economic impact to the entities identified in questions (2) - (4). ($500,000 or more, in aggregate)
There is not an expected major economic impact from this regulation as it does not create costs for the Education Professional Standards Board or the regulated entities, and simply repeals 16 KAR 7:010.
(b) The methodology and resources used to reach this conclusion:
The methodology and resources used to determine this is that it’s simply repealing the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program which previously had an appropriation for operation and has been unfunded and not operational since the Spring of 2018.
EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CABINET
Education Professional Standards Board
(New Administrative Regulation)
16 KAR 7:011.Repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
Section 1.
16 KAR 7:010, Kentucky Teacher Internship Program, is hereby repealed.JUSTIN MITCHELL, Board Chair
APPROVED BY AGENCY: June 4, 2024
FILED WITH LRC: June 14, 2024 at 11:25 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT PERIOD: A public hearing on this proposed administrative regulation shall be held on August 27, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. in the State Board Room, Fifth Floor, 300 Sower Boulevard, Frankfort, Kentucky. Individuals interested in being heard at this meeting shall notify this agency in writing five working days prior to the hearing, of their intent to attend. If no notification of intent to attend the hearing is received by that date, the hearing may be canceled. This hearing is open to the public. Any person who wishes to be heard will be given an opportunity to comment on the proposed administrative regulation. A transcript of the public hearing will not be made unless a written request for a transcript is made. If you do not wish to be heard at the public hearing, you may submit written comments on the proposed administrative regulation. Written comments shall be accepted through August 31, 2024. Send written notification of intent to be heard at the public hearing or written comments on the proposed administrative regulation to:
CONTACT PERSON: Todd Allen, General Counsel, Kentucky Department of Education, 300 Sower Boulevard, 5th Floor, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, phone 502-564-4474, fax 502-564-9321; email regcomments@education.ky.gov.
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TIERING STATEMENT
Contact Person:
Todd Allen
(1) Provide a brief summary of:
(a) What this administrative regulation does:
This administrative regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010 which establishes the standards for the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program.
(b) The necessity of this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation is necessary to repeal 16 KAR 7:010 which establishes the standards for the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program.
(c) How this administrative regulation conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
KRS 13A.310 allows the EPSB to repeal regulations that it wishes to no longer be effective. This regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010 because Senate Bill 265 of the 2024 Legislative Session amended KRS 161.030 to delete the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program from statute.
(d) How this administrative regulation currently assists or will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
This administrative regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010 to conform with Senate Bill 265 from the 2024 Legislative Session.
(2) If this is an amendment to an existing administrative regulation, provide a brief summary of:
(a) How the amendment will change this existing administrative regulation:
(b) The necessity of the amendment to this administrative regulation:
(c) How the amendment conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
(d) How the amendment will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
(3) List the type and number of individuals, businesses, organizations, or state and local governments affected by this administrative regulation:
171 Kentucky school districts and those pursuing initial teacher certification.
(4) Provide an analysis of how the entities identified in question (3) will be impacted by either the implementation of this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change, if it is an amendment, including:
(a) List the actions that each of the regulated entities identified in question (3) will have to take to comply with this administrative regulation or amendment:
No action will be needed to comply with this repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
(b) In complying with this administrative regulation or amendment, how much will it cost each of the entities identified in question (3):
There is no cost for complying with this repealer.
(c) As a result of compliance, what benefits will accrue to the entities identified in question (3):
Compliance will result in alignment with KRS 161.030 as amended by Senate Bill 265 from the 2024 Legislative Session which removed the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program from statute.
(5) Provide an estimate of how much it will cost the administrative body to implement this administrative regulation:
(a) Initially:
There are no costs expected to implement this repealer.
(b) On a continuing basis:
There are no expected continuing costs with this repealer.
(6) What is the source of the funding to be used for the implementation and enforcement of this administrative regulation:
No funding is needed as it is simply a repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
(7) Provide an assessment of whether an increase in fees or funding will be necessary to implement this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change if it is an amendment:
An increase in fees or funding will not be necessary for the Education Professional Standards Board to repeal 16 KAR 7:010.
(8) State whether or not this administrative regulation establishes any fees or directly or indirectly increases any fees:
No fees are established or increased by this repealer.
(9) TIERING: Is tiering applied?
Tiering is not applicable as this is simply a repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(1) Identify each state statute, federal statute, or federal regulation that requires or authorizes the action taken by the administrative regulation.
KRS 13A.310
(2) Identify the promulgating agency and any other affected state units, parts, or divisions:
The Education Professional Standards Board.
(a) Estimate the following for the first year:
Expenditures:
No additional expenditures are expected to be needed since this repeals a program that has been unfunded since 2018.
Revenues:
The amendment to this administrative regulation is not expected to generate any revenue.
Cost Savings:
No cost savings are expected with this amendment as the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program was only operational if there was an appropriation. The program has been unfunded since 2018, and has not been in operation since that time.
(b) How will expenditures, revenues, or cost savings differ in subsequent years?
Expenditures, revenues and cost savings are not expected to differ in subsequent years.
(3) Identify affected local entities (for example: cities, counties, fire departments, school districts):
Public-school districts.
(a) Estimate the following for the first year:
Expenditures:
There are no expected expenditures for districts as this is a repeal of 16 KAR 7:010.
Revenues:
This regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010. It will not generate revenue for districts.
Cost Savings:
There are no cost savings expected with this amendment.
(b) How will expenditures, revenues, or cost savings differ in subsequent years?
The expenditures, revenues and cost savings are not expected to differ in subsequent years.
(4) Identify additional regulated entities not listed in questions (2) or (3):
Applicants for initial teacher certification.
(a) Estimate the following for the first year:
Expenditures:
There are no expected expenditures for applicants to comply with this repealer.
Revenues:
This regulation repeals 16 KAR 7:010. It will not generate revenue for applicants.
Cost Savings:
There is no expected cost savings since there are no fees created or reduced by this regulation.
(b) How will expenditures, revenues, or cost savings differ in subsequent years?
The expenditures, revenues and cost savings are not expected to differ in subsequent years.
(5) Provide a narrative to explain the:
(a) Fiscal impact of this administrative regulation:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of the proposed repealer. This is simply repealing the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program which previously had an appropriation for operation and has been unfunded and not operational since the Spring of 2018.
(b) Methodology and resources used to determine the fiscal impact:
The methodology and resources used to determine that there is no fiscal impact, is this is simply repealing the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program which previously had an appropriation for operation and has been unfunded and not operational since the Spring of 2018.
(6) Explain:
(a) Whether this administrative regulation will have an overall negative or adverse major economic impact to the entities identified in questions (2) - (4). ($500,000 or more, in aggregate)
There is not an expected major economic impact from this regulation as it does not create costs for the Education Professional Standards Board or the regulated entities, and simply repeals 16 KAR 7:010.
(b) The methodology and resources used to reach this conclusion:
The methodology and resources used to determine this is that it’s simply repealing the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program which previously had an appropriation for operation and has been unfunded and not operational since the Spring of 2018.