Title 106 | Chapter 001 | Regulation 131
SUPERSEDED
This document is no longer current.
PREVIOUS VERSION
The previous document that this document is based upon is available.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT CABINET
Department of Military Affairs
(Amendment)
106 KAR 1:131.Kentucky Emergency Response Commission civil penalty assessment and hearings procedure.
Section 1.
Definitions.(1)
"Compliance Review Board" means any current five (5) members of the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission, selected by the commission chairman, to review and issue findings, recommendations, and penalties regarding violations of KRS 39E.050, 39E.120, 39E.130, 39E.190, 39E.220, and 39E.990, and any administrative regulation promulgated, or order issued pursuant to KRS Chapter 39E.(2)
"Notice of Non-Compliance" means the notice sent to a facility owner or operator to inform them of a violation, or violations, of KRS 39E or KAR Title 106 and the penalties due and owed per KRS 39E.990.Section 2.
Notice of Non-Compliance.(1)
The commission chairman, or designee, shall mail a notice of non-compliance when the commission has notice of the existence of a violation of any provision of KRS 39E.050, 39E.080, 39E.120, 39E.130, 39E.190, 39E.220, or 39E.990, or any administrative regulation promulgated, or order issued pursuant to KRS Chapter 39E.(2)
The notice of non-compliance shall contain the specific date, time, and place of the violation, if applicable, and a summary of the factual, legal, or other grounds upon which the notice is based, including the applicable provision of KRS Chapter 39E or KAR Title 106.(3)
Upon receiving a notice of non-compliance, the facility owner or operator shall either:(a)
Agree to the violation cited in the notice of non-compliance and become compliant by remedying the violation, submitting payment for past due fees, and submitting payment penalties, within thirty (30) days of the date of the notice of non-compliance; or(b)
Disagree with the violation and penalty cited in the notice of non-compliance. If the facility owner or operator disagrees with the notice of non-compliance, they may file a protest per Section 3 of this administrative regulation.(4)
The commission may grant an extension of time for actions in subsection (3)(a) of this section, to extended beyond thirty (30) days, with the approval of the commission chairman, or designee.Section 3.
Protesting a Notice of Non-Compliance.(1)
If a facility owner or operator protests the notice of non-compliance, the protest shall:(a)
Be received by the commission within thirty (30) days from the date of the notice of non-compliance;(b)
Be in writing; and(c)
Contain a supporting statement setting forth the grounds upon which the protest is made. Upon written request, the commission may grant an extension for filing the supporting statement if it determines the delay is necessary and unavoidable. The refusal of such extension may be reviewed in the same manner as a protested notice of non-compliance.(2)
If a protest meets the requirements of subsection (1) of this section, the facility owner or operator may waive or request a conference with the non-compliance review board.(a)
If a conference is requested, the compliance review board shall give notice of the conference date, place, and time to all affected persons. This notice shall be provided to the facility owner or operator at least twenty (20) days before the date of the conference.(b)
The conference may be held in person, or virtually, and per the Open Meeting Act requirements contained in KRS 61.800 to 61.850. The compliance review board shall give the facility owner or operator, and other affected persons, an opportunity to present a statement or evidence challenging the notice of non-compliance. The facility owner or operator may appear in person or by a designated representative.(c)
Further conferences may be held by mutual agreement.Section 4.
Findings and Recommendations and Final Decision.(1)
After considering the protest, including any matters presented at the final conference, the compliance review board shall issue findings and recommendations on any matter in controversy. These findings and recommendations shall be:(a)
In writing;(b)
Mailed to the facility owner or operator, and to all affected parties per Section 6 of this administrative regulation, within fourteen (14) days of issuance; and(c)
Mailed or transmitted to the chairman, or his designee, within fourteen (14) days of issuance.(2)
The commission shall approve or disapprove the findings and recommendations of the compliance review board and issue a final decision at the first scheduled and available commission meeting in which there is a quorum.(3)
The final decision shall be signed by the commission chairman, or a designee stating that it is a final decision of the commission, generally state the issue in controversy, the commission's position, and set forth the procedure for an appeal.(4)
The facility owner or operator shall have twenty (20) days after the final decision is signed, issued, and mailed via certified mail, to:(a)
Resolve the findings; or(b)
Appeal the commission's final decision per Section 5 of this administrative regulation by filing a request for an administrative hearing.Section 5.
Appeal of the Commission's Final Decision.(1)
The facility owner or operator shall request an administrative hearing by mailing such request to the commission chairman or designee within the time set forth in Section 4(4), of this administrative regulation.(2)
Upon receipt of the request, the commission chairman, or designee, shall request an administrative hearing officer for an administrative hearing. The administrative hearing will be held according to the procedures in KRS 13B.050.Section 6.
Service and Mailing of Documents.(1)
Service of documents by the commission, commission chairman or designee, or the compliance review board, shall be mailed by certified mail to the facility owner or operator at the address shown on the annual inventory report or facility plan required by KRS Chapter 39E. If no facility plans or annual inventory report has been filed, then to the last known address.(2)
All documents filed with the commission, commission chairman or designee, or the compliance review board, by any party, shall be served by mail upon all other parties.(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(3)
(4)
Section 2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Section 3.
Section 4.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
Section 5.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
Section 6.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Section 7.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Section 8.
Section 9.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(4)
(5)
(a)
(b)
Section 10.
Section 11.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Section 12.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Section 13.
(1)
(2)
Section 14.
(1)
(2)
This is to certify that the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission approved this administrative regulation unanimously by Motion #046-2023 on Wednesday, November 15, 2023. The director of the Division of Emergency Management concurs with this administrative regulation as required by KRS 39E.080.
DUSTIN HEISER, Interim Director
APPROVED BY AGENCY: December 14, 2023
FILED WITH LRC: December 15, 2023 at 11 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT PERIOD: A public hearing on this administrative regulation shall be held on February 28, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time at 100 Minuteman Parkway, Bldg. 100, Room 238 (EOC 2nd Floor Conference Room) Frankfort, Kentucky 40601. Individuals interested in being heard at this hearing shall notify this agency in writing by five workdays prior to the hearing, of their intent to attend. If no notification of intent to attend the hearing is received by that date, the hearing may be canceled. This hearing is open to the public. Any person who wishes to be heard will be given an opportunity to comment on the proposed administrative regulation. A transcript of the public hearing will not be made unless a written request for a transcript is made. If you do not wish to be heard at the public hearing, you may submit written comments on the proposed administrative regulation. Written comments shall be accepted through February 29, 2024. Send written notification of intent to be heard at the public hearing or written comments on the proposed administrative regulation to the contact person.
CONTACT PERSON: Corey Ann Howard Jackson, Legislative Liaison and Policy Specialist, Department of Military Affairs, 100 Minuteman Parkway, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, phone (502) 330-3323, fax (502) 607-1240, email corey.a.jackson23.nfg@army.mil.
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TIERING STATEMENT
Contact Person:
Corey Ann Howard Jackson
(1) Provide a brief summary of:
(a) What this administrative regulation does:
KRS 39E.990 provides penalties for any person violating any provision of KRS Chapter 39E, and any administrative regulation promulgated, or order issued, pursuant to KRS Chapter 39E. KRS Chapter 39E reflects the federal requirements of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986. This administrative regulation provides the procedure to assess, protest and appeal penalties provided for in KRS 39E.990.
(b) The necessity of this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation is necessary to carry out the requirements of KRS 39E.040(6) and KRS 39E.080(4) that require the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission (KERC) and the Division of Emergency Management to issue administrative regulations to implement KRS Chapter 39 E and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986. This Act, known as Title III, governs the reporting requirements and procedures for individuals, businesses, and governmental agencies regarding the manufacture, use, storage, or transportation of hazardous substances.
(c) How this administrative regulation conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
KRS 39E.990 provides penalties for any person violating KRS Chapter 39E. KRS Chapter 39E provides standards for facility owners or operators that manufacture, use, store, or transport hazardous substances. This administrative regulation supports compliance with the requirements of KRS 39E.990 by providing the procedure for the Commission to assess penalties and notify applicable owners or operators of facilities of non-compliance. This administrative regulation also provides methods for protest and appeal of penalties associated with non-compliance.
(d) How this administrative regulation currently assists or will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
This administrative regulation establishes the penalty process and procedure that results from non-compliance with the statutes governing the storage, transport, or manufacture of hazardous substances.
(2) If this is an amendment to an existing administrative regulation, provide a brief summary of:
(a) How the amendment will change this existing administrative regulation:
Provides a way to ensure compliance with the statutes and gives facility owners or operators an opportunity to become compliant after a notice of a violation before resorting to an administrative hearing.
(b) The necessity of the amendment to this administrative regulation:
There were errors and improper citations to sections within the regulation as well as inconsistencies regarding the trigger for administrative hearings.
(c) How the amendment conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
This administrative regulation supports compliance with the requirements of KRS 39E.990 by providing the procedure for the commission to assess penalties and notify applicable owners or operators of facilities of non-compliance.
(d) How the amendment will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
The amended regulation will be clear and allow the facility owners or operators due process while also allowing a route to compliance, without an administrative hearing.
(3) List the type and number of individuals, businesses, organizations, or state and local governments affected by this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation will affect the Department of Military Affairs, the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission (KERC) and individuals, businesses, and governmental agencies that manufacture, use, store, or transport hazardous substances.
(4) Provide an analysis of how the entities identified in question (3) will be impacted by either the implementation of this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change, if it is an amendment, including:
(a) List the actions that each of the regulated entities identified in question (3) will have to take to comply with this administrative regulation or amendment:
The overall requirements of the regulated entities will not change. This amendment will clarify options for Title II facilities to achieve compliance when given a notice of non-compliance. This will also allow the KERC to ensure greater compliance with KRS 39E with a more streamlined and simple penalty assessment and collection procedure.
(b) In complying with this administrative regulation or amendment, how much will it cost each of the entities identified in question (3):
There is no additional cost to these entities unless they incur a fee or penalty per KRS 39E.990.
(c) As a result of compliance, what benefits will accrue to the entities identified in question (3):
These entities will be notified of non-compliance and have an opportunity to become compliant before incurring greater fees or penalties.
(5) Provide an estimate of how much it will cost the administrative body to implement this administrative regulation:
(a) Initially:
None. The Department of Military Affairs administratively supports the KERC and this will not require additional costs. KERC fees are obtained through the required Tier II facilities fees. Those fees, and any penalties collected, then fund the KERC operation and a grant for Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPC).
(b) On a continuing basis:
See (5)(a).
(6) What is the source of the funding to be used for the implementation and enforcement of this administrative regulation:
KERC fees are obtained through the required Tier II facility fees. Those fees, and any penalties, fund the KERC operation and a grant for Local Emergency Planning Committees.
(7) Provide an assessment of whether an increase in fees or funding will be necessary to implement this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change if it is an amendment:
No. The Department of Military Affairs currently administratively supports the KERC and will continue this support. This continuation will not require additional costs.
(8) State whether or not this administrative regulation establishes any fees or directly or indirectly increases any fees:
No. This administrative regulation does not establish or increase fees.
(9) TIERING: Is tiering applied?
Tiering was not used. The regulation will not reduce or modify substantive regulatory requirements, eliminate some requirements entirely, simplify and reduce reporting and recordkeeping requirements, reduce the frequency of inspections, provide exemptions from inspections and other compliance activities, or delay compliance timetables.
FEDERAL MANDATE ANALYSIS COMPARISON
(1) Federal statute or regulation constituting the federal mandate.
The "Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986" at 42 U.S.C. 11000-11050.
(2) State compliance standards.
KRS Chapter 39E.
(3) Minimum or uniform standards contained in the federal mandate.
Emergency Planning and Notification standards are located in 42 U.S.C. 11001. Substances and facilities covered and notification are located in 42 U.S.C. 11003. Subtitle B, Sec. 311 (42 U.S.C. 11021) contains federal reporting requirements.
(4) Will this administrative regulation impose stricter requirements, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements, than those required by the federal mandate?
No.
(5) Justification for the imposition of the stricter standard, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements.
N/A
FISCAL NOTE
(1) What units, parts, or divisions of state or local government (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) will be impacted by this administrative regulation?
The Department of Military Affairs and local emergency management planning committees (LEPCs). LEPCs are most likely to become aware of facilities that are not complying with KRS Chapter 39E.
(2) Identify each state or federal statute or federal regulation that requires or authorizes the action taken by the administrative regulation.
KRS 39E.990
(3) Estimate the effect of this administrative regulation on the expenditures and revenues of a state or local government agency (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) for the first full year the administrative regulation is to be in effect.
None. The fund has already been established.
(a) How much revenue will this administrative regulation generate for the state or local government (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) for the first year?
Unknown. Unable to determine the number of penalties that may be collected. Penalties and fees which are collected are kept in a fund and used for the operation of the KERC and grants to the LEPCs that provide training, equipment, and planning.
(b) How much revenue will this administrative regulation generate for the state or local government (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) for subsequent years?
Unknown. See (3)(a) above.
(c) How much will it cost to administer this program for the first year?
No additional cost will be incurred.
(d) How much will it cost to administer this program for subsequent years?
No additional cost will be incurred.
Note: If specific dollar estimates cannot be determined, provide a brief narrative to explain the fiscal impact of the administrative regulation.
Revenues (+/-):
No additional revenue will be generated by the regulations.
Expenditures (+/-):
No additional expenditures will be incurred.
Other Explanation:
(4) Estimate the effect of this administrative regulation on the expenditures and cost savings of regulated entities for the first full year the administrative regulation is to be in effect.
(a) How much cost savings will this administrative regulation generate for the regulated entities for the first year?
No additional cost savings.
(b) How much cost savings will this administrative regulation generate for the regulated entities for subsequent years?
No additional cost savings.
(c) How much will it cost the regulated entities for the first year?
No additional cost will be incurred if regulated entities comply with KRS Chapter 39E.
(d) How much will it cost the regulated entities for subsequent years?
No additional cost will be incurred if regulated entities comply with KRS Chapter 39E.
Note: If specific dollar estimates cannot be determined, provide a brief narrative to explain the fiscal impact of the administrative regulation.
Cost Savings (+/-):
No additional cost savings will be realized.
Expenditures (+/-):
No additional costs will be incurred
Other Explanation:
(5) Explain whether this administrative regulation will have a major economic impact, as defined below.
"Major economic impact" means an overall negative or adverse economic impact from an administrative regulation of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or more on state or local government or regulated entities, in aggregate, as determined by the promulgating administrative bodies. [KRS 13A.010(13)] The administrative regulation will have no major economic impact.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT CABINET
Department of Military Affairs
(Amendment)
106 KAR 1:131.Kentucky Emergency Response Commission civil penalty assessment and hearings procedure.
Section 1.
Definitions.(1)
"Compliance Review Board" means any current five (5) members of the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission, selected by the commission chairman, to review and issue findings, recommendations, and penalties regarding violations of KRS 39E.050, 39E.120, 39E.130, 39E.190, 39E.220, and 39E.990, and any administrative regulation promulgated, or order issued pursuant to KRS Chapter 39E.(2)
"Notice of Non-Compliance" means the notice sent to a facility owner or operator to inform them of a violation, or violations, of KRS 39E or KAR Title 106 and the penalties due and owed per KRS 39E.990.Section 2.
Notice of Non-Compliance.(1)
The commission chairman, or designee, shall mail a notice of non-compliance when the commission has notice of the existence of a violation of any provision of KRS 39E.050, 39E.080, 39E.120, 39E.130, 39E.190, 39E.220, or 39E.990, or any administrative regulation promulgated, or order issued pursuant to KRS Chapter 39E.(2)
The notice of non-compliance shall contain the specific date, time, and place of the violation, if applicable, and a summary of the factual, legal, or other grounds upon which the notice is based, including the applicable provision of KRS Chapter 39E or KAR Title 106.(3)
Upon receiving a notice of non-compliance, the facility owner or operator shall either:(a)
Agree to the violation cited in the notice of non-compliance and become compliant by remedying the violation, submitting payment for past due fees, and submitting payment penalties, within thirty (30) days of the date of the notice of non-compliance; or(b)
Disagree with the violation and penalty cited in the notice of non-compliance. If the facility owner or operator disagrees with the notice of non-compliance, they may file a protest per Section 3 of this administrative regulation.(4)
The commission may grant an extension of time for actions in subsection (3)(a) of this section, to extended beyond thirty (30) days, with the approval of the commission chairman, or designee.Section 3.
Protesting a Notice of Non-Compliance.(1)
If a facility owner or operator protests the notice of non-compliance, the protest shall:(a)
Be received by the commission within thirty (30) days from the date of the notice of non-compliance;(b)
Be in writing; and(c)
Contain a supporting statement setting forth the grounds upon which the protest is made. Upon written request, the commission may grant an extension for filing the supporting statement if it determines the delay is necessary and unavoidable. The refusal of such extension may be reviewed in the same manner as a protested notice of non-compliance.(2)
If a protest meets the requirements of subsection (1) of this section, the facility owner or operator may waive or request a conference with the non-compliance review board.(a)
If a conference is requested, the compliance review board shall give notice of the conference date, place, and time to all affected persons. This notice shall be provided to the facility owner or operator at least twenty (20) days before the date of the conference.(b)
The conference may be held in person, or virtually, and per the Open Meeting Act requirements contained in KRS 61.800 to 61.850. The compliance review board shall give the facility owner or operator, and other affected persons, an opportunity to present a statement or evidence challenging the notice of non-compliance. The facility owner or operator may appear in person or by a designated representative.(c)
Further conferences may be held by mutual agreement.Section 4.
Findings and Recommendations and Final Decision.(1)
After considering the protest, including any matters presented at the final conference, the compliance review board shall issue findings and recommendations on any matter in controversy. These findings and recommendations shall be:(a)
In writing;(b)
Mailed to the facility owner or operator, and to all affected parties per Section 6 of this administrative regulation, within fourteen (14) days of issuance; and(c)
Mailed or transmitted to the chairman, or his designee, within fourteen (14) days of issuance.(2)
The commission shall approve or disapprove the findings and recommendations of the compliance review board and issue a final decision at the first scheduled and available commission meeting in which there is a quorum.(3)
The final decision shall be signed by the commission chairman, or a designee stating that it is a final decision of the commission, generally state the issue in controversy, the commission's position, and set forth the procedure for an appeal.(4)
The facility owner or operator shall have twenty (20) days after the final decision is signed, issued, and mailed via certified mail, to:(a)
Resolve the findings; or(b)
Appeal the commission's final decision per Section 5 of this administrative regulation by filing a request for an administrative hearing.Section 5.
Appeal of the Commission's Final Decision.(1)
The facility owner or operator shall request an administrative hearing by mailing such request to the commission chairman or designee within the time set forth in Section 4(4), of this administrative regulation.(2)
Upon receipt of the request, the commission chairman, or designee, shall request an administrative hearing officer for an administrative hearing. The administrative hearing will be held according to the procedures in KRS 13B.050.Section 6.
Service and Mailing of Documents.(1)
Service of documents by the commission, commission chairman or designee, or the compliance review board, shall be mailed by certified mail to the facility owner or operator at the address shown on the annual inventory report or facility plan required by KRS Chapter 39E. If no facility plans or annual inventory report has been filed, then to the last known address.(2)
All documents filed with the commission, commission chairman or designee, or the compliance review board, by any party, shall be served by mail upon all other parties.This is to certify that the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission approved this administrative regulation unanimously by Motion #046-2023 on Wednesday, November 15, 2023. The director of the Division of Emergency Management concurs with this administrative regulation as required by KRS 39E.080.
DUSTIN HEISER, Interim Director
APPROVED BY AGENCY: December 14, 2023
FILED WITH LRC: December 15, 2023 at 11 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT PERIOD: A public hearing on this administrative regulation shall be held on February 28, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time at 100 Minuteman Parkway, Bldg. 100, Room 238 (EOC 2nd Floor Conference Room) Frankfort, Kentucky 40601. Individuals interested in being heard at this hearing shall notify this agency in writing by five workdays prior to the hearing, of their intent to attend. If no notification of intent to attend the hearing is received by that date, the hearing may be canceled. This hearing is open to the public. Any person who wishes to be heard will be given an opportunity to comment on the proposed administrative regulation. A transcript of the public hearing will not be made unless a written request for a transcript is made. If you do not wish to be heard at the public hearing, you may submit written comments on the proposed administrative regulation. Written comments shall be accepted through February 29, 2024. Send written notification of intent to be heard at the public hearing or written comments on the proposed administrative regulation to the contact person.
CONTACT PERSON: Corey Ann Howard Jackson, Legislative Liaison and Policy Specialist, Department of Military Affairs, 100 Minuteman Parkway, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, phone (502) 330-3323, fax (502) 607-1240, email corey.a.jackson23.nfg@army.mil.
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TIERING STATEMENT
Contact Person:
Corey Ann Howard Jackson
(1) Provide a brief summary of:
(a) What this administrative regulation does:
KRS 39E.990 provides penalties for any person violating any provision of KRS Chapter 39E, and any administrative regulation promulgated, or order issued, pursuant to KRS Chapter 39E. KRS Chapter 39E reflects the federal requirements of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986. This administrative regulation provides the procedure to assess, protest and appeal penalties provided for in KRS 39E.990.
(b) The necessity of this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation is necessary to carry out the requirements of KRS 39E.040(6) and KRS 39E.080(4) that require the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission (KERC) and the Division of Emergency Management to issue administrative regulations to implement KRS Chapter 39 E and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986. This Act, known as Title III, governs the reporting requirements and procedures for individuals, businesses, and governmental agencies regarding the manufacture, use, storage, or transportation of hazardous substances.
(c) How this administrative regulation conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
KRS 39E.990 provides penalties for any person violating KRS Chapter 39E. KRS Chapter 39E provides standards for facility owners or operators that manufacture, use, store, or transport hazardous substances. This administrative regulation supports compliance with the requirements of KRS 39E.990 by providing the procedure for the Commission to assess penalties and notify applicable owners or operators of facilities of non-compliance. This administrative regulation also provides methods for protest and appeal of penalties associated with non-compliance.
(d) How this administrative regulation currently assists or will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
This administrative regulation establishes the penalty process and procedure that results from non-compliance with the statutes governing the storage, transport, or manufacture of hazardous substances.
(2) If this is an amendment to an existing administrative regulation, provide a brief summary of:
(a) How the amendment will change this existing administrative regulation:
Provides a way to ensure compliance with the statutes and gives facility owners or operators an opportunity to become compliant after a notice of a violation before resorting to an administrative hearing.
(b) The necessity of the amendment to this administrative regulation:
There were errors and improper citations to sections within the regulation as well as inconsistencies regarding the trigger for administrative hearings.
(c) How the amendment conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
This administrative regulation supports compliance with the requirements of KRS 39E.990 by providing the procedure for the commission to assess penalties and notify applicable owners or operators of facilities of non-compliance.
(d) How the amendment will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
The amended regulation will be clear and allow the facility owners or operators due process while also allowing a route to compliance, without an administrative hearing.
(3) List the type and number of individuals, businesses, organizations, or state and local governments affected by this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation will affect the Department of Military Affairs, the Kentucky Emergency Response Commission (KERC) and individuals, businesses, and governmental agencies that manufacture, use, store, or transport hazardous substances.
(4) Provide an analysis of how the entities identified in question (3) will be impacted by either the implementation of this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change, if it is an amendment, including:
(a) List the actions that each of the regulated entities identified in question (3) will have to take to comply with this administrative regulation or amendment:
The overall requirements of the regulated entities will not change. This amendment will clarify options for Title II facilities to achieve compliance when given a notice of non-compliance. This will also allow the KERC to ensure greater compliance with KRS 39E with a more streamlined and simple penalty assessment and collection procedure.
(b) In complying with this administrative regulation or amendment, how much will it cost each of the entities identified in question (3):
There is no additional cost to these entities unless they incur a fee or penalty per KRS 39E.990.
(c) As a result of compliance, what benefits will accrue to the entities identified in question (3):
These entities will be notified of non-compliance and have an opportunity to become compliant before incurring greater fees or penalties.
(5) Provide an estimate of how much it will cost the administrative body to implement this administrative regulation:
(a) Initially:
None. The Department of Military Affairs administratively supports the KERC and this will not require additional costs. KERC fees are obtained through the required Tier II facilities fees. Those fees, and any penalties collected, then fund the KERC operation and a grant for Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPC).
(b) On a continuing basis:
See (5)(a).
(6) What is the source of the funding to be used for the implementation and enforcement of this administrative regulation:
KERC fees are obtained through the required Tier II facility fees. Those fees, and any penalties, fund the KERC operation and a grant for Local Emergency Planning Committees.
(7) Provide an assessment of whether an increase in fees or funding will be necessary to implement this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change if it is an amendment:
No. The Department of Military Affairs currently administratively supports the KERC and will continue this support. This continuation will not require additional costs.
(8) State whether or not this administrative regulation establishes any fees or directly or indirectly increases any fees:
No. This administrative regulation does not establish or increase fees.
(9) TIERING: Is tiering applied?
Tiering was not used. The regulation will not reduce or modify substantive regulatory requirements, eliminate some requirements entirely, simplify and reduce reporting and recordkeeping requirements, reduce the frequency of inspections, provide exemptions from inspections and other compliance activities, or delay compliance timetables.
FEDERAL MANDATE ANALYSIS COMPARISON
(1) Federal statute or regulation constituting the federal mandate.
The "Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986" at 42 U.S.C. 11000-11050.
(2) State compliance standards.
KRS Chapter 39E.
(3) Minimum or uniform standards contained in the federal mandate.
Emergency Planning and Notification standards are located in 42 U.S.C. 11001. Substances and facilities covered and notification are located in 42 U.S.C. 11003. Subtitle B, Sec. 311 (42 U.S.C. 11021) contains federal reporting requirements.
(4) Will this administrative regulation impose stricter requirements, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements, than those required by the federal mandate?
No.
(5) Justification for the imposition of the stricter standard, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements.
N/A
FISCAL NOTE
(1) What units, parts, or divisions of state or local government (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) will be impacted by this administrative regulation?
The Department of Military Affairs and local emergency management planning committees (LEPCs). LEPCs are most likely to become aware of facilities that are not complying with KRS Chapter 39E.
(2) Identify each state or federal statute or federal regulation that requires or authorizes the action taken by the administrative regulation.
KRS 39E.990
(3) Estimate the effect of this administrative regulation on the expenditures and revenues of a state or local government agency (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) for the first full year the administrative regulation is to be in effect.
None. The fund has already been established.
(a) How much revenue will this administrative regulation generate for the state or local government (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) for the first year?
Unknown. Unable to determine the number of penalties that may be collected. Penalties and fees which are collected are kept in a fund and used for the operation of the KERC and grants to the LEPCs that provide training, equipment, and planning.
(b) How much revenue will this administrative regulation generate for the state or local government (including cities, counties, fire departments, or school districts) for subsequent years?
Unknown. See (3)(a) above.
(c) How much will it cost to administer this program for the first year?
No additional cost will be incurred.
(d) How much will it cost to administer this program for subsequent years?
No additional cost will be incurred.
Note: If specific dollar estimates cannot be determined, provide a brief narrative to explain the fiscal impact of the administrative regulation.
Revenues (+/-):
No additional revenue will be generated by the regulations.
Expenditures (+/-):
No additional expenditures will be incurred.
Other Explanation:
(4) Estimate the effect of this administrative regulation on the expenditures and cost savings of regulated entities for the first full year the administrative regulation is to be in effect.
(a) How much cost savings will this administrative regulation generate for the regulated entities for the first year?
No additional cost savings.
(b) How much cost savings will this administrative regulation generate for the regulated entities for subsequent years?
No additional cost savings.
(c) How much will it cost the regulated entities for the first year?
No additional cost will be incurred if regulated entities comply with KRS Chapter 39E.
(d) How much will it cost the regulated entities for subsequent years?
No additional cost will be incurred if regulated entities comply with KRS Chapter 39E.
Note: If specific dollar estimates cannot be determined, provide a brief narrative to explain the fiscal impact of the administrative regulation.
Cost Savings (+/-):
No additional cost savings will be realized.
Expenditures (+/-):
No additional costs will be incurred
Other Explanation:
(5) Explain whether this administrative regulation will have a major economic impact, as defined below.
"Major economic impact" means an overall negative or adverse economic impact from an administrative regulation of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or more on state or local government or regulated entities, in aggregate, as determined by the promulgating administrative bodies. [KRS 13A.010(13)] The administrative regulation will have no major economic impact.