Title 803 | Chapter 002 | Regulation 260REG
PROPOSED
This document is not yet current.
EDUCATION AND LABOR CABINET
Department of Workplace Standards
Division of Occupational Safety and Health Compliance
(New Administrative Regulation)
803 KAR 2:260.Appeal procedure.
Section 1.
Definitions.(1)
"Commissioner" is defined by KRS 338.0125(7).(2)
"Fees and other expenses" means reasonable expenses of expert witnesses, the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project which is found by the court to be necessary for the preparation of the party's case, and reasonable attorney fees. The amount of fees awarded under this subsection shall be based upon prevailing market rates for the kind and quality of the services furnished, except that(a)
no expert witness shall be compensated at a rate in excess of the highest rate of compensation for expert witnesses paid by the Commissioner; and(b)
attorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $125 per hour unless the Franklin Circuit Court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.(3)
"Small business" is defined as(a)
An individual whose net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; or(b)
Any owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization, the net worth of which did not exceed $7,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, and which had not more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; except that an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, or a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association. For purposes of 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), "party" also includes a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601.(4)
"Small organization" means any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field, unless an agency establishes, after opportunity for public comment, one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register;(5)
"Small governmental jurisdiction" means governments of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of less than fifty thousand, unless an agency establishes, after opportunity for public comment, one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and which are based on such factors as location in rural or sparsely populated areas or limited revenues due to the population of such jurisdiction, and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.(6)
"Small entity" shall have the same meaning as the terms "small business", "small organization" and "small governmental jurisdiction" defined in paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) of this section.(7)
"Party" means a party, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3), who is (a) An individual whose net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; or (b) Any owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization, the net worth of which did not exceed $7,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, and which had not more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; except that an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, or a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association. For purposes of 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), "party" also includes a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601.Section 2.
Complaint.(1)
A party seeking an award under KRS 338.091 shall file a complaint with the Franklin Circuit Court within thirty (30) days after the final disposition of the adversary adjudication.(2)
The complaint shall identify the party and the proceeding for which an award is sought. The complaint shall show that the complainant has prevailed and identify the position of the Commissioner that the party alleges was not substantially justified; or, if the party has not prevailed, shall show that the Commissioner's demand was substantially in excess of the decision of the judge or Commission and was unreasonable when compared with that decision under the facts and circumstances of that case. The complaint shall also identify the Commissioner's position(s) in the proceeding that the party alleges was or were not substantially justified or the Commissioner's demand that is alleged to be excessive and unreasonable. Unless the party is an individual, the complaint shall also state the number of employees of the complainant and briefly describe the type and purpose of its organization or business.(3)
The complaint shall also show that the party meets the definition of "party" in 29 C.F.R. 2204.201, including adequate documentation of its net worth, as set forth in 29 C.F.R. 2204.302.(4)
The complaint shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought, subject to the requirements and limitations as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(A), with adequate documentation as set forth in 29 C.F.R. 2204.303.(5)
The complaint shall be signed by the complainant or an authorized officer, attorney, or agent of the complainant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the complaint is true and correct.(6)
Each complainant except a qualified tax-exempt organization, cooperative association, or, in the case of a complaint for an award related to an allegedly excessive demand by the Commissioner, a small entity as that term is defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(6), shall provide with its complaint a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the complainant as required by 29 C.F.R. 2204.301(c) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the complainant that provides full disclosure of the complainant's assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the complainant qualifies as a party as defined in 29 C.F.R. 2204.201. The Franklin Circuit Court may require a complainant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.(7)
Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, a complainant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may request that the documents be filed under seal or otherwise be treated as confidential, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 2200.8 and 29 C.F.R. 2200.52.(8)
The complaint shall be accompanied by adequate documentation of the fees and other expenses incurred after the initiation of the adversary adjudication, including, but not limited to, the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project. A complaint seeking an increase in fees to account for inflation pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 2200.406 shall also include adequate documentation of the change in the consumer price index for the attorney or agent's locality. With respect to a claim for fees and expenses involving an excessive demand by the Commissioner, the complaint shall be accompanied by adequate documentation of such fees and expenses incurred after initiation of the adversary adjudication for which an award is sought attributable to the portion of the demand alleged to be excessive and unreasonable. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the complaint, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the complainant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The Franklin Circuit Court may require the complainant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any fees or expenses claimed.(9)
Any complaint for an award, or any accompanying documentation related to a complaint shall be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding in accordance with 29 C.F.R. 2200.7 and 29 C.F.R. 2200.8 except as provided in 29 C.F.R. 2204.302(b) for confidential financial information.(10)
Within twenty (20) days after service of a complaint, the Commissioner shall file an answer to the complaint. Unless the Commissioner requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the twenty (20) day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested(11)
If the Commissioner and the complainant believe that the issues in the fee complaint can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional thirty (30) days, and further extensions may be granted by the Franklin Circuit Court upon request.(12)
The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the Commissioner's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the Secretary shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under 29 C.F.R. 2204.405.(13)
Within fifteen (15) days after service of an answer, the complainant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the complainant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under 29 C.F.R. 2204.405.HISTORY: COMPILER'S NOTE: 2025 RS HB 6, enacted by the General Assembly on March 27, 2025, altered the information to be provided at the time an administrative regulation is filed. Aside from formatting changes necessary to upload the regulation into the LRC's publication application, this regulation has been published as submitted by the agency.
JAMIE LINK, Secretary
APPROVED BY AGENCY: July 1, 2025
FILED WITH LRC: July 1, 2025 at 3:42 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT PERIOD: A public hearing on this administrative regulation shall be held September 22, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. EDST via Zoom. Public access to the meeting is available at: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/86360536416, or telephone at (713) 353-0212, (888) 822-7517 toll free, conference code 194378. Individuals interested in being heard at this hearing shall notify this agency in writing by five workdays prior to the hearing, of their intent to attend. If no notification of intent to attend the hearing was received by that date, the hearing may be cancelled. A transcript of the public hearing will not be made unless a written request for a transcript is made. If you do not wish to be heard at the public hearing, you may submit written comments on the proposed administrative regulation. Written comments shall be accepted through August 31, 2025. Send written notification of intent to be heard at the public hearing or written comments on the proposed administrative regulation to the contact person.
CONTACT PERSON: Jason H. Hernandez, General Counsel, Education and Labor Cabinet Division of Workplace Standards, Mayo-Underwood Building, 500 Mero Street, 3rd Floor, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, phone (502) 782-4466, fax (502) 564-4769, email jason.hernandez@ky.gov.
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TIERING STATEMENT
Contact Person:
Jason H. Hernandez
(1) Provide a brief summary of:
(a) What this administrative regulation does:
Section 1 and Section 2 of this administrative regulation imposes a new direct cost on OSH by allowing employers to appeal to Franklin Circuit Court for attorney’s fees and other associated costs.
(b) The necessity of this administrative regulation:
This regulation is necessary to meet the requirements established KRS 338.091.
(c) How this administrative regulation conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
KRS 338.051(3) requires the Kentucky Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to promulgate occupational safety and health administrative regulations and authorizes the chairman to reference federal standards without board approval if necessary to meet federal time requirements. This administrative regulation is necessary to meet the requirements established in KRS 338.091. This regulation complies and conforms with the authorizing statutes.
(d) How this administrative regulation currently assists or will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
This regulation is necessary to meet the requirements established in KRS 338.091.
(2) If this is an amendment to an existing administrative regulation, provide a brief summary of:
(a) How the amendment will change this existing administrative regulation:
N/A
(b) The necessity of the amendment to this administrative regulation:
N/A
(c) How the amendment conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
N/A
(d) How the amendment will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
N/A
(3) List the type and number of individuals, businesses, organizations, or state and local governments affected by this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation affects all employers in the Commonwealth engaged in activities covered by KRS Chapter 338.
(4) Provide an analysis of how the entities identified in question (3) will be impacted by either the implementation of this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change, if it is an amendment, including:
(a) List the actions that each of the regulated entities identified in question (3) will have to take to comply with this administrative regulation or amendment:
No additional compliance duties are imposed, and no immediate action is required.
(b) In complying with this administrative regulation or amendment, how much will it cost each of the entities identified in question (3):
There is risk of unknown additional cost to the OSH Program to implement this administrative regulation.
(c) As a result of compliance, what benefits will accrue to the entities identified in question (3):
This administrative regulation authorizes an employer to appeal to Franklin Circuit Court for attorney’s fees and court costs against the OSH Program within the procedural parameters of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412.
(5) Provide an estimate of how much it will cost the administrative body to implement this administrative regulation:
(a) Initially:
There is an unknown cost to the OSH Program to implement this administrative regulation.
(b) On a continuing basis:
There are unknown new costs to the OSH Program associated with this regulation.
(6) What is the source of the funding to be used for the implementation and enforcement of this administrative regulation:
Current state and federal funding.
(7) Provide an assessment of whether an increase in fees or funding will be necessary to implement this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change if it is an amendment:
There is a possible increase in funding necessary to implement this administrative regulation.
(8) State whether or not this administrative regulation establishes any fees or directly or indirectly increases any fees:
This administrative regulation establishes potential unknown fees to the OSH Program.
(9) TIERING: Is tiering applied?
Tiering is not applied. All employers covered by KRS Chapter 338 are treated equally.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(1) Identify each state statute, federal statute, or federal regulation that requires or authorizes the action taken by the administrative regulation:
338.051, 338.091
(2) State whether this administrative regulation is expressly authorized by an act of the General Assembly, and if so, identify the act:
This administrative regulation is expressly authorized by an act of the General Assembly.
(3)(a) Identify the promulgating agency and any other affected state units, parts, or divisions:
This administrative regulation affects any unit, part, or division of state or local government covered by KRS Chapter 338.
(b) Estimate the following for each affected state unit, part, or division identified in (3)(a):
1. Expenditures:
For the first year:
Unknown
For subsequent years:
Unknown
2. Revenues:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
3. Cost Savings:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
(4)(a) Identify affected local entities (for example: cities, counties, fire departments, school districts):
N/A
(b) Estimate the following for each affected local entity identified in (4)(a):
1. Expenditures:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
2. Revenues:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
3. Cost Savings:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
(5)(a) Identify any affected regulated entities not listed in (3)(a) or (4)(a):
None
(b) Estimate the following for each regulated entity identified in (5)(a):
1. Expenditures:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
2. Revenues:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
3. Cost Savings:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
(6) Provide a narrative to explain the following for each entity identified in (3)(a), (4)(a), and (5)(a)
(a) Fiscal impact of this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation imposes an unknown cost burden on OSH.
(b) Methodology and resources used to reach this conclusion:
Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412.
(7) Explain, as it relates to the entities identified in (3)(a), (4)(a), and (5)(a):
(a) Whether this administrative regulation will have a "major economic impact", as defined by KRS 13A.010(13):
This administrative regulation will have a "major economic impact" as defined by KRS 13A.010(14).
(b) The methodology and resources used to reach this conclusion:
This administrative regulation imposes a new direct cost burden on OSH by allowing employers to appeal to Franklin Circuit Court for attorney’s fees.
FEDERAL MANDATE ANALYSIS COMPARISON
(1) Federal statute or regulation constituting the federal mandate.
N/A
(2) State compliance standards.
N/A
(3) Minimum or uniform standards contained in the federal mandate.
N/A
(4) Will this administrative regulation impose stricter requirements, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements, than those required by the federal mandate?
N/A
(5) Justification for the imposition of the stricter standard, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements.
This regulation does not impose stricter requirements.
EDUCATION AND LABOR CABINET
Department of Workplace Standards
Division of Occupational Safety and Health Compliance
(New Administrative Regulation)
803 KAR 2:260.Appeal procedure.
Section 1.
Definitions.(1)
"Commissioner" is defined by KRS 338.0125(7).(2)
"Fees and other expenses" means reasonable expenses of expert witnesses, the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project which is found by the court to be necessary for the preparation of the party's case, and reasonable attorney fees. The amount of fees awarded under this subsection shall be based upon prevailing market rates for the kind and quality of the services furnished, except that(a)
no expert witness shall be compensated at a rate in excess of the highest rate of compensation for expert witnesses paid by the Commissioner; and(b)
attorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $125 per hour unless the Franklin Circuit Court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.(3)
"Small business" is defined as(a)
An individual whose net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; or(b)
Any owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization, the net worth of which did not exceed $7,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, and which had not more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; except that an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, or a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association. For purposes of 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), "party" also includes a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601.(4)
"Small organization" means any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field, unless an agency establishes, after opportunity for public comment, one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register;(5)
"Small governmental jurisdiction" means governments of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of less than fifty thousand, unless an agency establishes, after opportunity for public comment, one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and which are based on such factors as location in rural or sparsely populated areas or limited revenues due to the population of such jurisdiction, and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.(6)
"Small entity" shall have the same meaning as the terms "small business", "small organization" and "small governmental jurisdiction" defined in paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) of this section.(7)
"Party" means a party, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3), who is (a) An individual whose net worth did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; or (b) Any owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, unit of local government, or organization, the net worth of which did not exceed $7,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, and which had not more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated; except that an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code, or a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association. For purposes of 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(4), "party" also includes a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601.Section 2.
Complaint.(1)
A party seeking an award under KRS 338.091 shall file a complaint with the Franklin Circuit Court within thirty (30) days after the final disposition of the adversary adjudication.(2)
The complaint shall identify the party and the proceeding for which an award is sought. The complaint shall show that the complainant has prevailed and identify the position of the Commissioner that the party alleges was not substantially justified; or, if the party has not prevailed, shall show that the Commissioner's demand was substantially in excess of the decision of the judge or Commission and was unreasonable when compared with that decision under the facts and circumstances of that case. The complaint shall also identify the Commissioner's position(s) in the proceeding that the party alleges was or were not substantially justified or the Commissioner's demand that is alleged to be excessive and unreasonable. Unless the party is an individual, the complaint shall also state the number of employees of the complainant and briefly describe the type and purpose of its organization or business.(3)
The complaint shall also show that the party meets the definition of "party" in 29 C.F.R. 2204.201, including adequate documentation of its net worth, as set forth in 29 C.F.R. 2204.302.(4)
The complaint shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought, subject to the requirements and limitations as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(A), with adequate documentation as set forth in 29 C.F.R. 2204.303.(5)
The complaint shall be signed by the complainant or an authorized officer, attorney, or agent of the complainant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the complaint is true and correct.(6)
Each complainant except a qualified tax-exempt organization, cooperative association, or, in the case of a complaint for an award related to an allegedly excessive demand by the Commissioner, a small entity as that term is defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(6), shall provide with its complaint a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the complainant as required by 29 C.F.R. 2204.301(c) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the complainant that provides full disclosure of the complainant's assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the complainant qualifies as a party as defined in 29 C.F.R. 2204.201. The Franklin Circuit Court may require a complainant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.(7)
Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, a complainant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may request that the documents be filed under seal or otherwise be treated as confidential, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 2200.8 and 29 C.F.R. 2200.52.(8)
The complaint shall be accompanied by adequate documentation of the fees and other expenses incurred after the initiation of the adversary adjudication, including, but not limited to, the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project. A complaint seeking an increase in fees to account for inflation pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 2200.406 shall also include adequate documentation of the change in the consumer price index for the attorney or agent's locality. With respect to a claim for fees and expenses involving an excessive demand by the Commissioner, the complaint shall be accompanied by adequate documentation of such fees and expenses incurred after initiation of the adversary adjudication for which an award is sought attributable to the portion of the demand alleged to be excessive and unreasonable. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the complaint, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the complainant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The Franklin Circuit Court may require the complainant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any fees or expenses claimed.(9)
Any complaint for an award, or any accompanying documentation related to a complaint shall be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding in accordance with 29 C.F.R. 2200.7 and 29 C.F.R. 2200.8 except as provided in 29 C.F.R. 2204.302(b) for confidential financial information.(10)
Within twenty (20) days after service of a complaint, the Commissioner shall file an answer to the complaint. Unless the Commissioner requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the twenty (20) day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested(11)
If the Commissioner and the complainant believe that the issues in the fee complaint can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional thirty (30) days, and further extensions may be granted by the Franklin Circuit Court upon request.(12)
The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the Commissioner's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the Secretary shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under 29 C.F.R. 2204.405.(13)
Within fifteen (15) days after service of an answer, the complainant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the complainant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under 29 C.F.R. 2204.405.HISTORY: COMPILER'S NOTE: 2025 RS HB 6, enacted by the General Assembly on March 27, 2025, altered the information to be provided at the time an administrative regulation is filed. Aside from formatting changes necessary to upload the regulation into the LRC's publication application, this regulation has been published as submitted by the agency.
JAMIE LINK, Secretary
APPROVED BY AGENCY: July 1, 2025
FILED WITH LRC: July 1, 2025 at 3:42 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT PERIOD: A public hearing on this administrative regulation shall be held September 22, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. EDST via Zoom. Public access to the meeting is available at: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/86360536416, or telephone at (713) 353-0212, (888) 822-7517 toll free, conference code 194378. Individuals interested in being heard at this hearing shall notify this agency in writing by five workdays prior to the hearing, of their intent to attend. If no notification of intent to attend the hearing was received by that date, the hearing may be cancelled. A transcript of the public hearing will not be made unless a written request for a transcript is made. If you do not wish to be heard at the public hearing, you may submit written comments on the proposed administrative regulation. Written comments shall be accepted through August 31, 2025. Send written notification of intent to be heard at the public hearing or written comments on the proposed administrative regulation to the contact person.
CONTACT PERSON: Jason H. Hernandez, General Counsel, Education and Labor Cabinet Division of Workplace Standards, Mayo-Underwood Building, 500 Mero Street, 3rd Floor, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, phone (502) 782-4466, fax (502) 564-4769, email jason.hernandez@ky.gov.
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS AND TIERING STATEMENT
Contact Person:
Jason H. Hernandez
(1) Provide a brief summary of:
(a) What this administrative regulation does:
Section 1 and Section 2 of this administrative regulation imposes a new direct cost on OSH by allowing employers to appeal to Franklin Circuit Court for attorney’s fees and other associated costs.
(b) The necessity of this administrative regulation:
This regulation is necessary to meet the requirements established KRS 338.091.
(c) How this administrative regulation conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
KRS 338.051(3) requires the Kentucky Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to promulgate occupational safety and health administrative regulations and authorizes the chairman to reference federal standards without board approval if necessary to meet federal time requirements. This administrative regulation is necessary to meet the requirements established in KRS 338.091. This regulation complies and conforms with the authorizing statutes.
(d) How this administrative regulation currently assists or will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
This regulation is necessary to meet the requirements established in KRS 338.091.
(2) If this is an amendment to an existing administrative regulation, provide a brief summary of:
(a) How the amendment will change this existing administrative regulation:
N/A
(b) The necessity of the amendment to this administrative regulation:
N/A
(c) How the amendment conforms to the content of the authorizing statutes:
N/A
(d) How the amendment will assist in the effective administration of the statutes:
N/A
(3) List the type and number of individuals, businesses, organizations, or state and local governments affected by this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation affects all employers in the Commonwealth engaged in activities covered by KRS Chapter 338.
(4) Provide an analysis of how the entities identified in question (3) will be impacted by either the implementation of this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change, if it is an amendment, including:
(a) List the actions that each of the regulated entities identified in question (3) will have to take to comply with this administrative regulation or amendment:
No additional compliance duties are imposed, and no immediate action is required.
(b) In complying with this administrative regulation or amendment, how much will it cost each of the entities identified in question (3):
There is risk of unknown additional cost to the OSH Program to implement this administrative regulation.
(c) As a result of compliance, what benefits will accrue to the entities identified in question (3):
This administrative regulation authorizes an employer to appeal to Franklin Circuit Court for attorney’s fees and court costs against the OSH Program within the procedural parameters of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412.
(5) Provide an estimate of how much it will cost the administrative body to implement this administrative regulation:
(a) Initially:
There is an unknown cost to the OSH Program to implement this administrative regulation.
(b) On a continuing basis:
There are unknown new costs to the OSH Program associated with this regulation.
(6) What is the source of the funding to be used for the implementation and enforcement of this administrative regulation:
Current state and federal funding.
(7) Provide an assessment of whether an increase in fees or funding will be necessary to implement this administrative regulation, if new, or by the change if it is an amendment:
There is a possible increase in funding necessary to implement this administrative regulation.
(8) State whether or not this administrative regulation establishes any fees or directly or indirectly increases any fees:
This administrative regulation establishes potential unknown fees to the OSH Program.
(9) TIERING: Is tiering applied?
Tiering is not applied. All employers covered by KRS Chapter 338 are treated equally.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(1) Identify each state statute, federal statute, or federal regulation that requires or authorizes the action taken by the administrative regulation:
338.051, 338.091
(2) State whether this administrative regulation is expressly authorized by an act of the General Assembly, and if so, identify the act:
This administrative regulation is expressly authorized by an act of the General Assembly.
(3)(a) Identify the promulgating agency and any other affected state units, parts, or divisions:
This administrative regulation affects any unit, part, or division of state or local government covered by KRS Chapter 338.
(b) Estimate the following for each affected state unit, part, or division identified in (3)(a):
1. Expenditures:
For the first year:
Unknown
For subsequent years:
Unknown
2. Revenues:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
3. Cost Savings:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
(4)(a) Identify affected local entities (for example: cities, counties, fire departments, school districts):
N/A
(b) Estimate the following for each affected local entity identified in (4)(a):
1. Expenditures:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
2. Revenues:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
3. Cost Savings:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
(5)(a) Identify any affected regulated entities not listed in (3)(a) or (4)(a):
None
(b) Estimate the following for each regulated entity identified in (5)(a):
1. Expenditures:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
2. Revenues:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
3. Cost Savings:
For the first year:
None
For subsequent years:
None
(6) Provide a narrative to explain the following for each entity identified in (3)(a), (4)(a), and (5)(a)
(a) Fiscal impact of this administrative regulation:
This administrative regulation imposes an unknown cost burden on OSH.
(b) Methodology and resources used to reach this conclusion:
Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412.
(7) Explain, as it relates to the entities identified in (3)(a), (4)(a), and (5)(a):
(a) Whether this administrative regulation will have a "major economic impact", as defined by KRS 13A.010(13):
This administrative regulation will have a "major economic impact" as defined by KRS 13A.010(14).
(b) The methodology and resources used to reach this conclusion:
This administrative regulation imposes a new direct cost burden on OSH by allowing employers to appeal to Franklin Circuit Court for attorney’s fees.
FEDERAL MANDATE ANALYSIS COMPARISON
(1) Federal statute or regulation constituting the federal mandate.
N/A
(2) State compliance standards.
N/A
(3) Minimum or uniform standards contained in the federal mandate.
N/A
(4) Will this administrative regulation impose stricter requirements, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements, than those required by the federal mandate?
N/A
(5) Justification for the imposition of the stricter standard, or additional or different responsibilities or requirements.
This regulation does not impose stricter requirements.